Articles Posted in Medical Malpractice

Published on: | by

Pursuant to state and federal law, parties are permitted to pursue civil lawsuits, including medical malpractice claims, without the assistance of an attorney. Medical malpractice cases are challenging, however, and parties that file them without legal counsel are likely to make mistakes that impact their right to recover damages. This was demonstrated in a recent Maryland opinion delivered by the district court, in which it dismissed the plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims because of a lack of jurisdiction. If you were hurt by the negligence of your doctor, it is in your best interest to retain the assistance of a Maryland medical malpractice attorney to help you pursue damages.

History of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against hospital employees in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The plaintiff’s complaint asserted that jurisdiction was proper because the defendants forced him to do things against his will. To his complaint, he attached a document that indicated he was discharged from a psychiatric program due to his failure to comply with the program rules and an order from a judge that committed him involuntarily to the hospital where the defendants worked. The plaintiff also moved to proceed in forma pauperis. The court granted the motion but also dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint.

Jurisdiction In Medical Malpractice Matters

In the opinion dismissing the complaint, the court explained that federal courts have limited jurisdiction. As such, a federal district court may only preside over a case if it possesses the authority granted by the Constitution and statutory law to do so. Thus, if a party wishes to proceed in federal court, they must allege and, if challenged, must show that the federal court can exercise subject matter jurisdiction over the case. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Parties in medical malpractice cases typically rely heavily on expert testimony and other evidence to establish their positions; if a party is precluded from offering certain evidence, they may be unable to prove their assertions. As such, it is not uncommon for parties in medical malpractice cases to file motions in limine prior to trial, asking the courts to limit what evidence their opponents are permitted to introduce. In a recent Maryland medical malpractice case arising out of a negligently performed spinal surgery, a court explained the grounds for granting motions in limine. If you were injured due to the carelessness of your surgeon, it is wise to confer with a Maryland medical malpractice attorney about what claims you may be able to pursue.

The History of the Case

Allegedly, the defendant performed a lumbar endoscopic discectomy on the plaintiff. The plaintiff experienced extreme pain following the procedure. During a surgical follow-up visit, the defendant advised the plaintiff that she may have re-herniated one of the discs he repaired and that she had residual scar tissue surrounding her spine. The plaintiff underwent two additional procedures on her back that were performed by other physicians but continued to experience pain.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

People who suffer harm due to the incompetence of their healthcare providers will often seek compensation via medical malpractice claims. While many people pursuing such claims will present their evidence to a jury, others will ask a judge to rule on issues of liability and damages; this was demonstrated in a recent Maryland case in which the plaintiff alleged she suffered emotional and psychological injuries because of the tortious conduct of the defendant healthcare provider’s employee. If you were injured by the carelessness of a healthcare provider, it is wise to confer with a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer to discuss your options for seeking damages.

The Facts of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff was treated at a medical center operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was a veteran of the United States military who suffered from multiple health issues; the medical center provided veterans with medical care. During a treatment visit, one of the defendant’s employees walked in on the plaintiff’s medical exam without permission. The plaintiff was partially disrobed at the time and undergoing an examination.

Reportedly, the employee subsequently made numerous unsolicited phone calls to the plaintiff. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, asserting professional negligence, vicarious liability, and other claims pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. The case proceeded to a bench trial, and after examining the evidence, the court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Maryland imposes strict requirements on parties that wish to pursue medical malpractice claims. Specifically, among other things, the Maryland Code dictates that a person that wants to seek damages from a health care provider for harm related to their treatment must first fulfill certain procedural requirements. If they neglect to do so, their claim will most likely be dismissed, as demonstrated in a recent opinion issued by a Maryland court. If you were harmed by inadequate medical treatment, it is wise to talk to a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer to determine your possible claims.

The Plaintiff’s Allegations

It is reported that the plaintiff and his wife sought fertility treatment from the defendant. They underwent an IVF procedure, during which ten eggs were retrieved and fertilized. Due to COVID-19, embryo transfers were prohibited for a period of time. The plaintiff requested and ultimately received a transfer of the couple’s embryos to another facility. Due to dissatisfaction with communication with the defendant, a dispute over charges, and other issues, the plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit asserting claims against the defendant. The defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint due to procedural defects. The court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appealed.

Procedural Requirements for Seeking Damages for Medical Malpractice

On appeal, the court affirmed the trial court ruling. The court explained that a plaintiff that wishes to pursue a medical malpractice case must submit a claim to the Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office (HCADRO) Director. They must also file a Certificate of Qualified Expert with the HCADRO director. Filing the claim and certificate with the HCADRO director are conditions precedent that must be met prior to filing an action in court. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, a federal statute, healthcare providers are essentially prohibited from refusing to provide critical care to patients in emergency situations simply because the patient does not have health insurance. While the EMTALA does not supplant state medical malpractice laws, it can provide a cause of action for pursuing claims against healthcare providers. Recently, a Maryland court discussed what a patient seeking damages under the EMTALA must prove to prevail. If you suffered harm due to insufficient care during a medical emergency, it is smart to speak to a Maryland medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible.

The Facts of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff was bitten by a Cane Corso dog when he was walking around his neighborhood. He returned home, where he proceeded to have a panic attack. He then called an ambulance and was transported to the defendant’s hospital. When he was at the hospital, he was asked if he had health insurance and stated that he did not.

Allegedly, after the conversation, the plaintiff asserts that the hospital staff did not follow critical screening protocols or the standard screening or treatment for dog bites. He was ultimately discharged with medication. He continued to complain of pain and panic attacks as a result of the dog bite. He subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, asserting EMTALA claims. The defendant then moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s lawsuit. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Pursuant to Maryland law, people harmed by medical malpractice have the right to seek compensation via civil claims. Parties that file medical malpractice lawsuits must comply with procedural rules, however, otherwise their claims may be dismissed, regardless of whether they have merit. This was emphasized recently when a Maryland court affirmed the dismissal of a medical malpractice case due to the plaintiff’s failure to properly serve the defendant. If you sustained losses because of negligent medical care, you might be owed compensation, and you should speak to a Maryland medical malpractice attorney about what you must do to establish liability.

Procedural History of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff filed a pro se lawsuit against the defendant seeking damages for numerous causes of action, including medical malpractice. Three weeks after the plaintiff filed his complaint, the trial court issued a writ of summons for the defendant. Approximately four months later, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint due to insufficient process, insufficient service, and lack of jurisdiction. The court granted the defendant’s motion, and the plaintiff appealed.

Procedural Rules for Pursuing Maryland Medical Malpractice Claims

On appeal, the court affirmed the trial court ruling. The court noted that the plaintiff attempted to serve the defendant on three occasions. During the first attempt, he delivered a handwritten summons that did not include the court’s seal. In the second attempt, he delivered one page of the court-issued summons but not the entire summons or the complaint. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Maryland law affords people the right to pursue medical malpractice claims without the assistance of an attorney. All parties pursuing such claims must comply with the applicable rules of procedure; however, otherwise, their claims may be dismissed, as illustrated recently in a Maryland case. As such, in most instances, it is beneficial for a person harmed by negligent medical care to seek the assistance of an attorney. If you were harmed by an incompetent healthcare provider, it is prudent to talk to a Maryland medical malpractice attorney to determine what measures you can take to protect your interests.

The Plaintiff’s Allegations

It is reported that when the plaintiff was restrained in a federal facility, a nurse administered medication to him that was meant for another person with the same name. The drug, which was a treatment for hepatitis C, caused the plaintiff to suffer nausea, cramping, and diarrhea. He subsequently filed a federal lawsuit against the nurse, seeking compensation for her incompetence and malpractice. He filed a motion seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis as well.

Procedural Rules Pertaining to Maryland Medical Malpractice Cases

While the court granted the plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, it ultimately dismissed his lawsuit. It explained that the federal courts have limited jurisdiction and can only preside over matters posing a federal question or disputes between diverse parties where the amount in controversy meets the jurisdictional threshold. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In the majority of medical malpractice cases, the plaintiff will aver that the defendant acted negligently rather than intentionally. Thus, a plaintiff generally must establish, among other things, that the defendant owed them a duty in order to establish liability in a medical malpractice case; if they cannot, their claim may be dismissed, as demonstrated in a recent opinion delivered in a medical malpractice case. If you suffered harm because of inadequate medical care, it is essential to consult a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer to assess what evidence you must produce to recover compensation.

The Facts of the Case

 It is reported that while the plaintiff was confined to a treatment facility, he willingly took a pill that was prescribed to another patient. He subsequently developed priapism and requested that a correctional officer call for medical treatment, but his requests went unheeded for an extended period of time. He asserts that the delays caused him to suffer permanent impotence. He subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, the entity that operated the treatment center, alleging that its medical negligence caused his harm. The defendant then moved for summary judgment in its favor.

Evidence Needed to Establish Medical Negligence

The court granted the defendant’s motion and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims. The court explained that the plaintiff was required to offer evidence that demonstrated that the defendant was bound by a certain standard of care, it deviated from the standard, and the deviation caused the plaintiff’s harm. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Cancer is a devastating illness, but in many instances, patients can go into remission with treatment. Metastatic cancer, however, is usually fatal, and while treatment can help slow the progression of the disease, it cannot offer a cure. As such, a doctor’s delays in providing treatment to a patient with terminal cancer may not constitute malpractice, as demonstrated in a recent Maryland case. If you lost a loved one due to a doctor’s delays in diagnosing or treating a terminal illness, it is smart to speak to a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer about what claims you may be able to pursue.

The Facts of the Case

It is alleged that the decedent sought treatment for pian in his groin in 2013. He was subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. A bone scan in November 2014 showed that the cancer had spread to his hip. The cancer was reclassified as metastatic, which is fatal. The decedent treated with an oncologist for the next year and a half and then was incarcerated. During his confinement, his care was managed by the defendant health services company and its employees.

Reportedly, due to communication issues between the defendant and the decedent’s previous care providers, there was a three-month delay in prescribing and treating the decedent with a specific cancer drug. The decedent ultimately passed away, and the plaintiff brought medical malpractice claims and other causes of action against the defendant. The defendant then moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appealed. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Under Maryland law, it is anticipated that doctors will provide their patients with competent care. Thus, if a doctor fails to properly perform their professional duties and a patient suffers harm as a result, the doctor may be found liable for medical malpractice. Doctors only owe duties to their patients, however. As such, they cannot be deemed responsible for harm that arises outside of the treatment offered pursuant to a doctor-patient relationship, as shown in a recent medical malpractice ruling.  If you were harmed by your healthcare provider’s recklessness, you may be owed compensation, and you should confer with a Maryland medical malpractice attorney about your potential claims.

The Facts of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff wife underwent a cardiac ablation that was performed by the defendant. Two weeks after the ablation, she had a follow up visit with the defendant; she did not report any symptoms at that time. Eleven days later, though, she began experiencing symptoms of a stroke and was taken by ambulance to a hospital. A critical care specialist at the hospital called the defendant at the plaintiff husband’s urging and informed him of the plaintiff wife’s symptoms.

Allegedly, the specialist asked the defendant about the ablation and asked him if he had any ideas regarding the plaintiff’s symptoms. The defendant did not inform the specialist that an atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) could be a side effect of an ablation and could cause the plaintiff wife’s symptoms. The plaintiff wife was subsequently diagnosed with AEF after she suffered a series of strokes that left her in a vegetative state. The plaintiffs instituted medical malpractice claims against the defendant, who moved for summary judgment on the grounds that there was no patient-doctor relationship at the time of the call from the specialist to the defendant. The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiff husband appealed.    Continue Reading ›

Contact Information
2002 Clipper Park Rd #300
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: (410) 889-1850Fax: (410) 235-3297

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Arfaa Law Group
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design