Medical Malpractice

Court Examines Exclusion of Experts in Medical Malplractice Cases

Published on: August 28, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

A malpractice case can end before a jury hears it when expert proof falls short. That risk is acute when postoperative injuries require specialists to connect treatment with lasting harm. A recent federal appeal examined whether two experts reliably linked delayed stroke mitigation to permanent neurological injury. If you believe negligent hospital care caused life-changing complications, consult a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney promptly about preserving evidence and securing the expert support your claim may require.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, a 42-year-old patient arrived at a hospital in June 2022 with severe chest pain and underwent emergency repair of an ascending aortic dissection. After six procedures concluded without identified complications, the patient entered intensive care in critical but stable condition. Confusion appeared the next day, followed by concern about altered brain activity and severe weakness in both legs. Neurology recommended magnetic resonance imaging and a head scan because of concern for a spinal cord stroke.

Reportedly, clinicians deferred the MRI because transport outside intensive care, reduced monitoring, and removal of wires used for blood-pressure management posed safety concerns. An MRI days later showed a stroke. The patient asserted that providers had not timely raised blood pressure or considered a lumbar drain. After rehabilitation, the patient claimed continuing limitations, while the defendants cited improved strength, mobility, and daily functioning. Continue Reading ›

Court Discusses Physical Examinations in Maryland Medical Malpractice Cases

Published on: August 21, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

A medical malpractice lawsuit can force an injured patient to undergo another examination, this time at the defense’s request. That prospect raises immediate questions about privacy, physical discomfort, and how far discovery should reach. A recent federal ruling in Maryland confronted those concerns when the defense sought a flexible laryngoscopy to examine claimed vocal cord paralysis. If a surgical injury has disrupted your breathing, voice, or daily life, speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about protecting your rights during the claim process.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the plaintiff consulted a surgeon about the thyroid gland in September 2023 and underwent a total thyroidectomy the following month. After surgery, the plaintiff experienced respiratory distress and stridor, a high-pitched sound associated with a narrowed or obstructed upper airway. The surgeon ordered reintubation approximately three hours later. Following extubation two days afterward, the plaintiff continued to experience intermittent stridor, swallowing difficulty, and a weak voice while receiving intensive care.

Maryland Court Discusses Timeliness of Medical Malpractice Claims

Published on: August 14, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

Maryland permits only one wrongful death action for a person’s death, yet each beneficiary must act timely to pursue an individual recovery. A recent medical malpractice appeal examined whether a parent named as a use plaintiff could intervene after three years under the relation-back doctrine, serving as a stark reminder of why families must protect their rights before deadlines expire. If you lost a loved one due to negligent medical care, it is in your best interest to retain a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney who can help you navigate your claims.

Case Setting

Allegedly, a nine-year-old child with chronic constipation experienced severe abdominal pain after approximately two weeks without a bowel movement. A parent took the child to an urgent care facility on August 28, 2020. A physician administered an enema, examined the child’s abdomen, and discharged the child that evening even though the child had not passed a bowel movement. The next morning, the child developed vomiting and diarrhea, became unresponsive, and suffered cardiac arrest and gastrointestinal bleeding. The child died on August 30, 2020. An autopsy attributed the death to complications of bowel obstruction caused by congenital constipation.

Reportedly, one parent filed a medical malpractice claim with Maryland’s Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office on August 16, 2023, and waived arbitration. That parent filed a circuit court complaint on September 22, asserting negligence, wrongful death, and survival claims. The complaint identified the other parent as a use plaintiff. Service occurred after the three-year anniversary of the child’s death.

Maryland Court Discusses Procedural Requirements in Medical Malpractice Cases

Published on: August 7, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

Maryland medical malpractice claims must pass through a specialized pre-suit process before a claimant may pursue them in court. Missing an expert certificate or filing deadline can end a case without a decision on negligent care. This was demonstrated in a recent Maryland appellate decision that illustrated how strictly courts enforce those requirements. If you were injured by incompetent medical care, it is important to act promptly, and you should discuss your potential claims with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff received emergency-room care on June 3, 2021, and an intravenous line may have been inserted improperly into the plaintiff’s hand. Acting without counsel, the plaintiff filed both a circuit court complaint and a document presenting the same claim to Maryland’s Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office on April 19, 2024. The defendant hospital moved to dismiss the court action because the plaintiff had neither filed a certificate from a qualified expert nor waived arbitration as required by the Health Care Malpractice Claims Act.

Reportedly, the circuit court granted that motion on July 5, 2024. The plaintiff did not appeal but sent a letter requesting that the case remain on hold during a state medical board investigation. The letter lacked a certificate of service, and the court took no action. The administrative office later dismissed the claim because the plaintiff had not supplied the required certificate.

Maryland Court Discusses Medical Malpractice Claims Against Federal Entities

Published on: July 29, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

Patients who receive medical treatment at Veterans Affairs hospitals, military medical facilities, and other federally operated healthcare institutions generally expect to have the same legal remedies available as those treated by private healthcare providers. While injured patients may pursue compensation when negligent medical care causes harm, claims against the federal government are governed by unique procedural rules that differ significantly from traditional medical malpractice lawsuits. A recent decision demonstrates how failing to comply with the Federal Tort Claims Act can prevent a medical malpractice claim from moving forward, regardless of the seriousness of the underlying allegations. If you believe you suffered injuries because of negligent care at a federal healthcare facility, speaking with an experienced Baltimore medical malpractice attorney can help ensure your claim is properly preserved.

Facts and Procedural History

Reportedly, the plaintiff underwent an elective surgical procedure at a Veterans Affairs medical center in Arizona. The plaintiff alleged that while under anesthesia, a physician administered medication and performed an additional medical procedure without obtaining informed consent. The plaintiff initially filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the physician in state court. The United States subsequently intervened, asserting that the physician was acting within the scope of federal employment during the procedure, removed the case to federal court, and substituted the United States as the defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The federal court ultimately dismissed the malpractice action because the plaintiff had not exhausted the administrative remedies required by the FTCA before filing suit.

It is reported that after the dismissal of the malpractice action, the plaintiff filed additional lawsuits challenging the conduct of various federal agencies and government attorneys involved in defending the original case. The plaintiff asserted constitutional claims, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and allegations relating to fraud on the court, contending that government officials had acted improperly during the defense of the underlying medical malpractice litigation. The defendants moved to dismiss the action on multiple jurisdictional and procedural grounds.

Maryland Court Clarifies Strict Deadlines for Wrongful Death Beneficiaries in Medical Malpractice Cases

Published on: July 22, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

When medical negligence results in the loss of a loved one, surviving family members often face overwhelming emotional and legal challenges. Maryland’s wrongful death laws are designed to allow eligible beneficiaries to seek compensation for the losses they have suffered, but strict procedural requirements govern those rights. A recent decision from a Maryland court demonstrates that even when a wrongful death action has already been filed, family members who fail to comply with Maryland’s intervention requirements may lose the opportunity to participate in any recovery. If you have lost a loved one because of suspected medical negligence, consulting an experienced Baltimore medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible can help protect your rights.

History of the Case

Reportedly, the underlying medical malpractice claim arose after a nine-year-old child died following treatment at an urgent care facility. According to the complaint, the child was evaluated for severe abdominal pain and constipation, treated, and discharged without passing a bowel movement. The following day, the child became critically ill, was transported to a hospital, and later died from complications associated with a bowel obstruction.

Maryland Court Discusses Procedural Requirements in Medical Malpractice Cases

Published on: July 15, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

Patients who suffer injuries because of negligent medical care often assume that filing a lawsuit before the statute of limitations expires is enough to preserve their rights. In Maryland, however, medical malpractice claims are governed by procedural requirements that are just as important as the allegations themselves. Before a case can proceed in circuit court, claimants generally must satisfy the requirements of the Maryland Health Care Malpractice Claims Act, including filing a claim with the Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office and submitting a Certificate of Qualified Expert. A recent decision from a Maryland court demonstrates that failing to comply with these mandatory steps can prevent a claim from moving forward, regardless of the underlying allegations. If you believe you have been harmed by negligent medical care, speaking with an experienced Baltimore medical malpractice attorney early in the process can help protect your rights.

Case Setting

Reportedly, the plaintiff filed a medical malpractice complaint against a hospital in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, alleging that an intravenous line had been improperly inserted during an emergency room visit several years earlier. At approximately the same time, the plaintiff also filed a claim with the Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office involving the same allegations. The hospital moved to dismiss the circuit court action, arguing that the plaintiff had neither filed the required Certificate of Qualified Expert nor waived arbitration as required by Maryland’s Health Care Malpractice Claims Act. The circuit court agreed and dismissed the complaint.

Maryland Woman Recovers Substantial Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case

Published on: July 8, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

Every surgical procedure carries risks, but patients also have the right to expect that their healthcare providers will exercise the degree of skill and care required by the medical profession. When a preventable surgical error causes a serious injury, the physical, emotional, and financial consequences can last for years. A recently reported Maryland jury verdict illustrates how allegations of negligent surgical care during childbirth can result in substantial compensation when a plaintiff proves that a healthcare provider failed to meet the applicable standard of care. If you or a loved one suffered harm because of a medical mistake, speaking with an experienced Baltimore medical malpractice attorney can help you understand your rights and determine whether you may have a viable claim.

Jury Awards Damages Following Alleged C-Section Negligence

Reportedly, a Montgomery County jury awarded approximately $825,646 to a woman who suffered a permanent bladder injury during a cesarean section performed at a Maryland hospital. According to the report, the plaintiff underwent a nonemergency C-section after labor failed to progress. Because she had previously undergone a cesarean delivery, scar tissue had formed between her bladder and uterus, creating additional surgical challenges. During the procedure, the physician allegedly made a significant incision into the patient’s bladder while separating the organs. The plaintiff contended that the physician negligently attempted to repair the injury before requesting assistance from a urologist, resulting in ongoing complications.

It is reported that although the patient’s child was delivered safely, the bladder injury did not heal properly, leading to the development of a vesicouterine fistula. Even after subsequent surgery corrected the abnormal connection between the bladder and uterus, the plaintiff reportedly continued to experience urinary dysfunction, bladder spasms, and incontinence requiring her to wear protective pads. The evidence further indicated that she had been advised not to become pregnant again because of the risk of additional complications. After a six-day trial, the jury found the physician liable and awarded $750,000 in noneconomic damages for pain and suffering, along with $75,646 for future medical expenses. According to the report, the noneconomic damages award fell below Maryland’s statutory cap applicable at the time of the verdict. Continue Reading ›

Court Analyzes Expert Testimony in Maryland Medical Malpractice Cases

Published on: June 27, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

Diagnosing rare medical conditions can present significant challenges. However, healthcare providers are still expected to recognize warning signs, order appropriate testing, and refer patients for additional evaluation when the accepted standard of care requires it. When a patient later suffers catastrophic harm because a serious condition went undiagnosed, the resulting medical malpractice litigation often turns on expert testimony establishing what reasonably competent physicians should have done under the circumstances. A recent Maryland decision illustrates how evidentiary rulings concerning expert opinions and medical literature can shape the outcome of a medical negligence trial. If you or a loved one suffered harm because a healthcare provider failed to diagnose a serious medical condition in a timely manner, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to discuss your legal options.

Factual and Procedural Setting

Allegedly, the decedent sought medical treatment over a period of approximately two years for symptoms that included shortness of breath, lightheadedness, and other cardiovascular complaints. Multiple healthcare providers evaluated the decedent, underwent cardiac testing, and were hospitalized on more than one occasion. Despite continued treatment, the decedent was never diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis, a progressive condition caused by abnormal protein deposits in the heart.

Reportedly, the decedent died suddenly in December 2017. An autopsy concluded that the death most likely resulted from an arrhythmia caused by previously undiagnosed cardiac amyloidosis. The decedent’s family subsequently filed a medical malpractice action alleging that the defendants failed to recognize the condition, diagnose it during the years preceding the decedent’s death, and provide treatment that could have extended the decedent’s life. Following a jury trial, the jury found that none of the defendants breached the applicable standard of care. The plaintiffs appealed, challenging several evidentiary and procedural rulings made before and during trial.

Maryland Court Explains Medical Malpractice Pre-Suit Requirements

Published on: June 20, 2026 | by Arfaa Law Group

Many medical malpractice cases never reach a jury because they are resolved on procedural issues before the evidence of negligence is fully considered. Maryland law requires patients to satisfy specific pre-suit obligations, and courts will also examine whether a complaint contains sufficient factual allegations connecting each healthcare provider to the claimed injury. A recent Maryland decision demonstrates that even where a patient alleges inadequate follow-up treatment and worsening medical conditions, a lawsuit may be dismissed if these legal requirements are not met. If you believe you or a loved one suffered preventable injuries because of substandard medical care, an experienced Baltimore medical malpractice attorney can help you understand whether you have a viable claim and the steps necessary to protect your rights.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff suffered serious pelvic injuries after being struck by a vehicle while incarcerated and was transported to a hospital for emergency treatment. After returning to the correctional facility, the plaintiff maintained that recommended follow-up care was denied and that the plaintiff continued experiencing severe back and hip pain, difficulty walking, and declining mobility. According to the complaint, repeated requests for additional treatment, including physical therapy and mobility assistance, were either delayed or inadequately addressed, resulting in worsening physical limitations.

Reportedly, the plaintiff filed suit asserting several claims against correctional officials and healthcare providers. As relevant to the medical negligence allegations, the plaintiff contended that the healthcare providers failed to provide appropriate follow-up treatment, delayed physical therapy, failed to provide a wheelchair in a timely manner, and prescribed ineffective medications that did not adequately address the plaintiff’s condition. The healthcare defendants moved to dismiss the medical negligence claim, arguing both that the plaintiff failed to satisfy Maryland’s mandatory pre-suit requirements and that the complaint did not sufficiently allege malpractice.